Link forensic science and the Covid pandemic to your lessons on instrumental analysis, separation techniques, data interpretation and health with UN sustainable development goals 16 and Easy-to-implement ways to link these topics to your lessons on energy sources, water resources, nanochemistry, health and climate change.
Site powered by Webvision Cloud. Skip to main content Skip to navigation. Source: RedlineVector. Download all. Topics Higher-order thinking and metacognition Pedagogy Resources Skills. Related articles. News Cooling homes with an endothermic reaction TZ Looking at the use of ammonium nitrate in a new and renewable cooling process. Ideas Reuse remote teaching resources TZ During lockdown, teachers worked so hard to create engaging remote resources.
News Sunlight produces thousands of compounds from plastic TZ Scientists dispel the theory that sunlight exposure simply fragments macroplastics that persist in the environment, but what are the implications for the environment?
Load more articles. You're not signed in. Only registered users can comment on this article. A suitable indicator should be chosen by considering the purpose of the evaluation, and how the results will be used. Scientific Evaluation assists us in: computing the research performance, comparison with peers, forecasting the growth, identifying the excellence in research, citation ranking, finding the influence of research, measuring the productivity, making policy decisions, securing funds for research and spotting trends.
Key concepts in science metrics are output and impact. Research traditionally is geared toward knowledge generation for the larger field. This site includes a wide range of resources that will help individuals learning about evaluation as well as those with many years of evaluation experience under their belts.
To start, check out Chapters 1 and 2 of the Principal Investigator's Guide to Managing Evaluation in Informal STEM Education Projects for a more detailed introduction to evaluation and stories from practitioners about the interplay between evaluation and project implementation. Other links on this page will take you to information on choosing and working with an evaluator , developing an evaluation plan , locating evaluation tools and instruments , reporting and disseminating evaluation findings , and understanding where the informal STEM evaluation field is headed.
See what we have learned from evaluation and research in these summaries. Working with an Evaluator. Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study.
Ethical review and approval was not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation was not required for this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.
RZ conceived the concept for this perspective. IH contributed to the final conceptualization and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. LF, IH, and RZ revised the manuscript and contributed to the critical editing and finalizing of the manuscript. All authors approve the submitted version. The responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Further thanks go to our reviewers and our editor whose ideas have increased the value of the contribution immensely.
We would also like to thank the practitioners and the funders in our workshops and roundtables for the insightful conversations about their experiences in evaluation, as well as the researchers in the field of science communication for the inspiring discussions that contributed to our work. This is a pragmatic choice and does not deny the multifaceted nature of science communication taking place in different societal settings. Besley, J. Scientists' views about communication objectives.
Public Underst. Breakwell, G. Risk communication: factors affecting impact. Bundesverband Hochschulkommunikation Der Siggener Kreis. European Citizen Science Association European Science Engagement Association n. Google Scholar. Grand, A. What works in the field? Evaluating informal science events. Hallahan, K. Holtzhausen and A. Zerfass London: Routledge , — Hon, L.
Demonstrating effectiveness in public relations: goals, objectives, and evaluation. Public Relat. Impact Unit Berlin: Wissenschaftim Dialog.
Jensen, E. The problems with science communication evaluation. Evidence-Based science communication. Kahan, D. Boykoff and D. Crow London: Routledge , — King, H. Marcinkowski, F. The changing rationale of science communication: a challenge to scientific autonomy. Phillips, T. A framework for articulating and measuring individual learning outcomes from participation in citizen science. Citizen Sci.
0コメント